Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject Sexology and sexuality
(Click here for project talk page)
  Resources & templates   Sex work task force
(Click here for task force talk page)

Project talk page

Hello, I would like to apply for an explanation of geji sexual issues here

[edit]

Hello, I am very anxious now. I have explained geji's sexual problems on geji's discussion page. I hope can read it in full. I hope this matter can be resolved, or it is appropriate to apply for Specialised noticeboards and Requests for comment. Thank you.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:G%C4%93j%C3%AC 清风与明月 (talk) 07:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: Talk:Gējì § Regarding the statement on sexual issues, I am not responding to a specific person, but I am here to popularize science—  jlwoodwa (talk) 07:50, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sexual disorder#Requested move 30 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Web-julio (talk) 03:26, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Heterosexual relationships among LGBTQ people#Requested move 26 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Web-julio (talk) 06:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Films about intersex#Requested move 14 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Web-julio (talk) 20:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Vagina#Requested move 14 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. JJPMaster (she/they) 01:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Trans#Requested_move 15 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 23:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for R v R

[edit]

R v R has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]